Postfix
Spamassassin RDNS_NONE 匹配,但有一個 RDNS
我遇到了一個小問題——垃圾郵件刺客的 RDNS_NONE 規則與我的外發郵件匹配,但為所有主機設置了 RDNS,它們位於傳遞鏈中。
如果我向“receipient-forwarding-address@example.com”發送一封電子郵件,該電子郵件被重定向到另一個帳戶,我會得到以下標題:
Return-Path: <receipient@example.com> Delivered-To: receipient@mailserver.example.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailserver.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD4D1D237A1 for <receipient@example.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:53:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: from mailserver.example.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailserver.example.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oUIr35qsq6dA for <receipient@example.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:53:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from closed-relay.outgoing-mailserver.com (closed-relay.outgoing-mailserver.com [123.123.123.123]) by mailserver.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC0B1D23794 for <receipient@example.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:53:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by closed-relay.outgoing-mailserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E3844379B for <receipient@example.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:52:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at closed-relay.outgoing-mailserver.com Received: from closed-relay.outgoing-mailserver.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (closed-relay.outgoing-mailserver.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MFFwpRFp8aZy for <receipient@example.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:52:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from outgoingantispam.outgoing-mailserver.com (outgoingantispam.outgoing-mailserver.com [1.1.1.1]) by closed-relay.outgoing-mailserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DB4E443794 for <receipient@example.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:52:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from my.webhosting-server.com (unknown [2.2.2.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outgoingantispam.outgoing-mailserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7DB3182E6E for <receipient@example.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:52:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by my.webhosting-server.com (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6D9E128223E; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:52:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: receipient-forwarding-address@example.com Delivered-To: receipient-forwarding-address@example.com Received: from mailserver.example.com (mailserver.example.com [80.147.42.111]) by my.webhosting-server.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 355FE281888 for <receipient-forwarding-address@example.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:52:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailserver.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E7E1D23786 for <receipient-forwarding-address@example.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:52:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: from mailserver.example.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailserver.example.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xwhW2ZM2tq8D for <receipient-forwarding-address@example.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:52:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.18.163.218] (ersc145.goemobile.de [134.76.38.145]) by mailserver.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF8D01D23770 for <receipient-forwarding-address@example.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:52:46 +0200 (CEST) From: Test <receipient@example.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4A11EFC1-C1A0-443C-A838-95B3BBBD3921" Subject: Test Message-Id: <93E953CD-A9A7-4DDE-B7E1-A09BAC115231@example.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:52:53 +0200 To: Test <receipient-forwarding-address@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-PPP-Message-ID: <20150417125248.13139.91108@my.webhosting-server.com> X-PPP-Vhost: provider.com X-Provider-MailScanner-EFA-Information: Please contact postmaster@provider.com for more information X-Provider-MailScanner-EFA-ID: A7DB3182E6E.ABCF8 X-Provider-MailScanner-EFA: Found to be clean X-Provider-MailScanner-EFA-From: receipient@example.com X-Provider-MailScanner-EFA-Watermark: 1429879971.81756@AJtdCMx5yR0wKblR1j2VGA
實際上,這個似乎缺少反向。
Received: from my.webhosting-server.com (unknown [2.2.2.2])
順便提一句。IP 也應該有匹配的 A 記錄(缺少 A 記錄可能導致 PTR 記錄被忽略)