託管千兆乙太網交換機需要多長時間才能啟動？
我在研究管理型交換機時發現了一個嚴重的缺點，而且我過去有一些經驗，那就是任何具有“大量”韌體的東西都會有很多與該韌體相關的問題。
我們正在研究機架式千兆交換機（48 埠）。看起來對於 48 個埠，我們唯一的選擇是託管交換機（Dell、Cisco/Linksys、HP 等）。我想知道的是各種託管交換機的啟動時間，但我不太了解。
如果您擁有一台，請您回答型號和冷啟動時間（以秒為單位）。我在網上讀到 Linksys（現在的 Cisco）SRW 系列有時需要將近 5 分鐘才能完全啟動，這對我們來說是不可接受的成本。
我特別想了解 Dell PowerConnect 託管交換機的啟動時間（型號 3548 和 5448），並想確認 SRW2048 或類似型號的 5 分鍾啟動時間，以及任何 HP ProCurve 啟動時間。
所有這些數字的組合應該形成一個有趣的管理交換機啟動時間的整體圖景。
$$ UPDATE: Further to those who think I am asking about boot-up time because I am silly enough to think that has anything to do with the actual operational performance, I have updated the above, to make it more clear that I’m interested in understanding the norms of this hardware type, not in forming an overall impression on switch performance based on one edge-case of boot time. Thanks for your time. $$ $$ UPDATE2: I’m going to add my own answer for the managed SRW switch that we bought yesterday, a Cisco (former-linksys) model … Is there anything wrong with not accepting AN ANSWER On this? I’d like to keep this question open to collect data points which might be useful to others, as well as to myself. In general, the longest time is 5 minutes, and the shortest are 1-2 minutes, with a nifty exception for the one HP ProCurve mentioned, which is super fast. $$.
好的，這是 PowerConnect 5324 為您提供的另一個數據點。它比您正在查看的模型落後幾代。所以，把它當作它的價值。
因此，下面的 ping 命令每秒向您發送 1 個 ping，您可以從下面的輸出中看到，從
reload命令下降到再次開始回复的點需要 108 秒。PowerConnect 5324 重啟 108 秒
date && ping 192.168.0.2 && date Thu Apr 15 00:06:45 EDT 2010 PING 192.168.0.2 (192.168.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.53 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.54 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.55 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2.60 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=2.55 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=2.76 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=2.50 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=2.63 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=3.51 ms .... 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=117 ttl=64 time=2026 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=118 ttl=64 time=1028 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=119 ttl=64 time=30.1 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=120 ttl=64 time=3.80 ms ^C --- 192.168.0.2 ping statistics --- 120 packets transmitted, 13 received, +45 errors, 89% packet loss, time 119202ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.502/239.520/2026.970/583.213 ms, pipe 4 Thu Apr 15 00:08:45 EDT 2010