Cluster

Redis/Sentinel 集群故障轉移導致“failover-abort-not-elected master”

  • September 14, 2020

我有一個 2 節點 Redis 集群設置。

$$ master $$192.168.56.102：Redis Master (:6379)、Redis Slave (:6380)、Sentinel(:26379)、Sentinel#2(:26380) $$ rescue $$192.168.56.103：Redis Master (:6379), Redis Slave (:6380), Sentinel(:26379) 每個從屬實例都是同一台機器上主實例的一個從屬實例。每個哨兵實例監控兩個主實例。

我將上述內容與 twemproxy（與此問題無關）和 client-reconfig-script 結合使用來更新 twemproxy 配置，以便應用程序繼續工作。

我正在停止伺服器以查看正在發生的事情以及一切是否正常。

$$ master $$stop redis master：quorum 能夠成功選舉一個新的 master。登錄下方。

==> /tmp/sentinel.log <==
[14701] 29 Dec 18:16:55.096 # +sdown slave 192.168.56.102:6379 192.168.56.102 6379 @ master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14705] 29 Dec 18:16:55.096 # +sdown slave 192.168.56.102:6379 192.168.56.102 6379 @ master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14701] 29 Dec 18:18:04.187 # -sdown slave 192.168.56.102:6379 192.168.56.102 6379 @ master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14705] 29 Dec 18:18:04.236 # -sdown slave 192.168.56.102:6379 192.168.56.102 6379 @ master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14705] 29 Dec 18:18:14.160 * +convert-to-slave slave 192.168.56.102:6379 192.168.56.102 6379 @ master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14705] 29 Dec 18:47:47.151 # +sdown slave 192.168.56.102:6379 192.168.56.102 6379 @ master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14701] 29 Dec 18:47:47.170 # +sdown slave 192.168.56.102:6379 192.168.56.102 6379 @ master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14701] 29 Dec 18:47:57.650 * +reboot slave 192.168.56.102:6379 192.168.56.102 6379 @ master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14705] 29 Dec 18:47:57.652 * +reboot slave 192.168.56.102:6379 192.168.56.102 6379 @ master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14705] 29 Dec 18:47:57.715 # -sdown slave 192.168.56.102:6379 192.168.56.102 6379 @ master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14701] 29 Dec 18:47:57.738 # -sdown slave 192.168.56.102:6379 192.168.56.102 6379 @ master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14705] 29 Dec 18:48:08.088 # +sdown master master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14701] 29 Dec 18:48:08.180 # +sdown master master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14701] 29 Dec 18:48:08.280 # +odown master master 192.168.56.102 6380 #quorum 2/2
[14701] 29 Dec 18:48:08.280 # +new-epoch 73
[14701] 29 Dec 18:48:08.280 # +try-failover master master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14701] 29 Dec 18:48:08.471 # +vote-for-leader a664b9f61df2b10bbbb5d865b01c599ddd36183c 73
[14701] 29 Dec 18:48:08.472 # 192.168.56.103:26379 voted for 491b32b95c547a8266faf9b04ce6b0c18486236b 73
[14705] 29 Dec 18:48:08.473 # +new-epoch 73
[14705] 29 Dec 18:48:08.475 # +vote-for-leader 491b32b95c547a8266faf9b04ce6b0c18486236b 73
[14701] 29 Dec 18:48:08.475 # 192.168.56.102:26380 voted for 491b32b95c547a8266faf9b04ce6b0c18486236b 73
[14701] 29 Dec 18:48:08.835 # +config-update-from sentinel 192.168.56.103:26379 192.168.56.103 26379 @ master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14705] 29 Dec 18:48:08.835 # +config-update-from sentinel 192.168.56.103:26379 192.168.56.103 26379 @ master 192.168.56.102 6380
[14705] 29 Dec 18:48:08.836 # +switch-master master 192.168.56.102 6380 192.168.56.102 6379
[14701] 29 Dec 18:48:08.836 # +switch-master master 192.168.56.102 6380 192.168.56.102 6379
[14701] 29 Dec 18:48:08.836 * +slave slave 192.168.56.102:6380 192.168.56.102 6380 @ master 192.168.56.102 6379
[14705] 29 Dec 18:48:08.836 * +slave slave 192.168.56.102:6380 192.168.56.102 6380 @ master 192.168.56.102 6379

==> /tmp/sent.log <==
Failing master: 192.168.56.102:6380
New Master: 192.168.56.102:6379

Failing master: 192.168.56.102:6380
New Master: 192.168.56.102:6379


==> /tmp/sentinel.log <==
[14705] 29 Dec 18:48:11.855 # +sdown slave 192.168.56.102:6380 192.168.56.102 6380 @ master 192.168.56.102 6379
[14701] 29 Dec 18:48:11.903 # +sdown slave 192.168.56.102:6380 192.168.56.102 6380 @ master 192.168.56.102 6379

您還可以看到我的重新配置腳本被成功呼叫並在螢幕上輸出了一些詳細資訊。

問題是當我試圖停止主實例時$$ rescue $$機器。哨兵不斷報“-failover-abort-not-elected master resque 192.168.56.103 6379”

==> /tmp/sentinel.log <==
[14705] 29 Dec 18:48:11.855 # +sdown slave 192.168.56.102:6380 192.168.56.102 6380 @ master 192.168.56.102 6379
[14701] 29 Dec 18:48:11.903 # +sdown slave 192.168.56.102:6380 192.168.56.102 6380 @ master 192.168.56.102 6379
[14705] 29 Dec 18:48:43.401 # -sdown slave 192.168.56.102:6380 192.168.56.102 6380 @ master 192.168.56.102 6379
[14701] 29 Dec 18:48:43.433 # -sdown slave 192.168.56.102:6380 192.168.56.102 6380 @ master 192.168.56.102 6379
[14705] 29 Dec 18:48:53.344 * +convert-to-slave slave 192.168.56.102:6380 192.168.56.102 6380 @ master 192.168.56.102 6379
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:23.617 # +sdown master resque 192.168.56.103 6379
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:23.625 # +sdown master resque 192.168.56.103 6379
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:23.674 # +odown master resque 192.168.56.103 6379 #quorum 2/2
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:23.674 # +new-epoch 74
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:23.674 # +try-failover master resque 192.168.56.103 6379
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:23.727 # +odown master resque 192.168.56.103 6379 #quorum 3/2
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:23.727 # +new-epoch 74
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:23.727 # +try-failover master resque 192.168.56.103 6379
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:23.886 # +vote-for-leader b608fcab7a201799826f4d9ee839aed3cf556fdf 74
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:23.889 # +vote-for-leader a664b9f61df2b10bbbb5d865b01c599ddd36183c 74
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:23.890 # 192.168.56.102:26380 voted for b608fcab7a201799826f4d9ee839aed3cf556fdf 74
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:23.890 # 192.168.56.102:26379 voted for a664b9f61df2b10bbbb5d865b01c599ddd36183c 74
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:23.893 # 192.168.56.103:26379 voted for b608fcab7a201799826f4d9ee839aed3cf556fdf 74
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:23.893 # 192.168.56.103:26379 voted for b608fcab7a201799826f4d9ee839aed3cf556fdf 74
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:23.980 # +elected-leader master resque 192.168.56.103 6379
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:23.980 # +failover-state-select-slave master resque 192.168.56.103 6379
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:24.064 # -failover-abort-no-good-slave master resque 192.168.56.103 6379
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:24.117 # Next failover delay: I will not start a failover before Mon Dec 29 18:49:32 2014
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:28.417 # -failover-abort-not-elected master resque 192.168.56.103 6379
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:28.489 # Next failover delay: I will not start a failover before Mon Dec 29 18:49:32 2014
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:32.217 # +new-epoch 75
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:32.217 # +try-failover master resque 192.168.56.103 6379
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:32.423 # +new-epoch 75
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:32.424 # +try-failover master resque 192.168.56.103 6379
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:32.433 # +vote-for-leader b608fcab7a201799826f4d9ee839aed3cf556fdf 75
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:32.435 # 192.168.56.103:26379 voted for 491b32b95c547a8266faf9b04ce6b0c18486236b 75
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:32.437 # +vote-for-leader a664b9f61df2b10bbbb5d865b01c599ddd36183c 75
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:32.438 # 192.168.56.102:26380 voted for b608fcab7a201799826f4d9ee839aed3cf556fdf 75
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:32.438 # 192.168.56.102:26379 voted for a664b9f61df2b10bbbb5d865b01c599ddd36183c 75
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:32.438 # 192.168.56.103:26379 voted for 491b32b95c547a8266faf9b04ce6b0c18486236b 75
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:36.636 # -failover-abort-not-elected master resque 192.168.56.103 6379
[14705] 29 Dec 18:49:36.691 # Next failover delay: I will not start a failover before Mon Dec 29 18:49:40 2014
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:36.843 # -failover-abort-not-elected master resque 192.168.56.103 6379
[14701] 29 Dec 18:49:36.905 # Next failover delay: I will not start a failover before Mon Dec 29 18:49:40 2014

沒有選出新的主節點，也沒有呼叫重新配置腳本。

我知道要選出新的主人，法定人數（n / 2 + 1）必須同意。這就是我使用 3 個哨兵進行測試的原因。

我不明白為什麼上面的例子沒有在選舉中結束（比如

$$ master $$). 我正在使用 Redis 伺服器 v=2.8.19 sha=0a21368c:1 malloc=jemalloc-3.6.0 bits=64 build=e570b291804f6e35

感謝您的幫助，請不要介意救援這個詞的嚴重拼寫錯誤！

  • 編輯
[master] redis slave config:

daemonize yes
pidfile "/var/run/redis/redis-server-slave.pid"
port 6380
tcp-backlog 511
bind 192.168.56.102
timeout 0
tcp-keepalive 0
loglevel notice
logfile "/var/log/redis/redis-server.log"
databases 16
save 900 1
save 300 10
save 60 10000
stop-writes-on-bgsave-error yes
rdbcompression yes
rdbchecksum yes
dbfilename "dump.rdb"
dir "/var/lib/redis"
slave-serve-stale-data yes
slave-read-only yes
repl-diskless-sync no
repl-diskless-sync-delay 5
repl-disable-tcp-nodelay no
slave-priority 100
appendonly no
appendfilename "appendonly.aof"
appendfsync everysec
no-appendfsync-on-rewrite no
auto-aof-rewrite-percentage 100
auto-aof-rewrite-min-size 64mb
aof-load-truncated yes
lua-time-limit 5000
slowlog-log-slower-than 10000
slowlog-max-len 128
latency-monitor-threshold 0
notify-keyspace-events ""
hash-max-ziplist-entries 512
hash-max-ziplist-value 64
list-max-ziplist-entries 512
list-max-ziplist-value 64
set-max-intset-entries 512
zset-max-ziplist-entries 128
zset-max-ziplist-value 64
hll-sparse-max-bytes 3000
activerehashing yes
client-output-buffer-limit normal 0 0 0
client-output-buffer-limit slave 256mb 64mb 60
client-output-buffer-limit pubsub 32mb 8mb 60
hz 10
aof-rewrite-incremental-fsync yes
maxclients 4064
# Generated by CONFIG REWRITE

slaveof 192.168.56.102 6379

$$ master $$主實例run_id：5c1ffb7742ad78cde12dbe4858747a314adaebe9 $$ master $$從屬實例 run_id：5772f437519bb38782d38f6675ae5d9157be2419 $$ rescue $$主實例run_id：5c1ffb7742ad78cde12dbe4858747a314adaebe9 $$ rescue $$從屬實例 run_id：5772f437519bb38782d38f6675ae5d9157be2419

$$ master $$哨兵（：26379）run_id：a664b9f​​61df2b10bbbb5d865b01c599ddd36183c $$ master $$哨兵（：26380）run_id：b608fcab7a201799826f4d9ee839aed3cf556fdf $$ slave $$哨兵（：26379）run_id：a664b9f​​61df2b10bbbb5d865b01c599ddd36183c 哨兵資訊

# Sentinel
sentinel_masters:2
sentinel_tilt:0
sentinel_running_scripts:0
sentinel_scripts_queue_length:0
master0:name=resque,status=ok,address=192.168.56.103:6379,slaves=0,sentinels=3
master1:name=master,status=ok,address=192.168.56.102:6379,slaves=1,sentinels=3

192.168.56.103 的哨兵配置

port 26379
logfile "/tmp/sentinel.log"
dir "/tmp"

sentinel monitor resque 192.168.56.103 6379 2
sentinel down-after-milliseconds resque 3000
sentinel failover-timeout resque 4000
sentinel client-reconfig-script resque /home/sm0ke/Projects/git/thrace/extra/sentinel-failover.py

sentinel config-epoch resque 0
sentinel leader-epoch resque 76
sentinel known-sentinel resque 192.168.56.102 26379 a664b9f61df2b10bbbb5d865b01c599ddd36183c
sentinel known-sentinel resque 192.168.56.102 26380 b608fcab7a201799826f4d9ee839aed3cf556fdf

maxclients 4064
daemonize yes
# Generated by CONFIG REWRITE
sentinel monitor master 192.168.56.102 6379 2
sentinel down-after-milliseconds master 3000
sentinel failover-timeout master 4000
sentinel client-reconfig-script master /home/sm0ke/Projects/git/thrace/extra/sentinel-failover.py
sentinel config-epoch master 73
sentinel leader-epoch master 73
sentinel known-slave master 192.168.56.102 6380
sentinel known-sentinel master 192.168.56.102 26380 b608fcab7a201799826f4d9ee839aed3cf556fdf
sentinel known-sentinel master 192.168.56.102 26379 a664b9f61df2b10bbbb5d865b01c599ddd36183c
sentinel current-epoch 76

192.168.56.103 上 Sentinel 的 redis-cli 資訊

# Server
redis_version:2.8.19
redis_git_sha1:0a21368c
redis_git_dirty:1
redis_build_id:e570b291804f6e35
redis_mode:sentinel
os:Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 x86_64
arch_bits:64
multiplexing_api:epoll
gcc_version:4.7.2
process_id:8345
run_id:491b32b95c547a8266faf9b04ce6b0c18486236b
tcp_port:26379
uptime_in_seconds:8054
uptime_in_days:0
hz:17
lru_clock:10594345
config_file:/etc/redis/sentinel.conf

# Sentinel
sentinel_masters:2
sentinel_tilt:0
sentinel_running_scripts:16
sentinel_scripts_queue_length:4
master0:name=resque,status=ok,address=192.168.56.103:6379,slaves=0,sentinels=3
master1:name=master,status=ok,address=192.168.56.102:6379,slaves=1,sentinels=3

忽略我的實例 ID 混淆，這是我的錯 - 我忘記了哨兵在哨兵中投票給領導者，而不是在候選人中投票給新主人，所以三個不同的 ID 是有道理的。

所以，真正的問題是：

master0:name=resque,status=ok,address=192.168.56.103:6379,slaves=0,sentinels=3

那裡沒有哨兵注意到的奴隸，所以他們沒有一個好的節點可以在投票期間生存。

檢查實例slaveof上的配置192.168.56.103:6380，確保該實例正在執行，然後連接到它以檢查它info以驗證它是否處於從屬狀態。一旦192.168.56.103:6379將其視為奴隸（在其info命令中），哨兵將把它作為已知奴隸撿起並能夠故障轉移到它。

引用自：https://serverfault.com/questions/655260

相關問答

Load-Balancing

Redis 高可用和負載均衡

  • March 21, 2016
檢視問答
Sql-Server

故障轉移群集客戶端訪問點僅響應所有者節點上的 Ping

  • October 3, 2020
檢視問答
Cluster

具有兩個網路介面的故障轉移起搏器集群？

  • September 16, 2020
檢視問答
Nginx

nginx 自動故障轉移負載均衡

  • June 27, 2018
檢視問答
Cluster

Redis 集群：最少 3 個主節點？

  • June 22, 2018
檢視問答
Cluster

為什麼 Redis Cluster 中 master 失敗後 Redis slave 不接管 master？

  • November 22, 2017
檢視問答